Arias Ozzello & Gignac LLP

We Handle Cases throughout the United States

800-475-2570

Navigation

Class Action | Employment Law | Misclassification | Rite Aid

Vanhorenbeek v. Rite Aid

Arias, Ozzello & Gignasc was one of several law firms who filed Class Actions on behalf of all residents of California who were employed as managers and assistant managers of Rite Aid who were classified as exempt in order to require them to work exorbitant work hours without being paid overtime. Class Settlement totaling in excess of $25,000,000.00 and injunctive relief was obtained.

Class Action | Employment Law | Improper Classification | Cal-ISO

Hardie v. California Independent System Operator (Cal-ISO)


Employees sought overtime compensation and injunctive relief for hundreds of control room employees of the Independent Systems Operator of California's electrical grid, who were improperly classified as exempt and who were required to work excessive hours with no overtime compensation. After an extended trial on the first of eight job classifications set to be tried, and a finding for the plaintiffs, a settlement was reached for all eight groups of employees in an amount in excess of $14,000,000.00 and re-classification of all of the subject employees as non-exempt. Some employees received as much as $200,000.00 in past unpaid overtime compensation.

Class Action | Employment Law | Misclassification

Geil v. Telemac Corporation

Computer technicians sought damages, injunctive relief, and penalties for overtime violations arising out of the practice of the billing and payment processing company Telemac of classifying its computer technicians as exempt and failing to pay them overtime. Case settled with all plaintiffs receiving their unpaid overtime compensation.

Class Action | Employment Law | Improper Classification | Robinson May Inc.

Duran v. Robinson May Inc.

Seeking compensatory damages and injunctive relief for hundreds of "Area Sales Managers" improperly classified as exempt employees which exemption required them to work exorbitant hours with no overtime compensation.

Employment Law | Misclassification | Unpaid Wages

Carlin v. NCS Pearson, Inc.

Following September 11, 2001, the United States Department of Transportation established the Transportation Security Administration ("TSA"). The purpose of the TSA was to effectuate, control, oversee and implement security at the airports located throughout the United States. Pursuant to this objective the TSA contracted with NCS Pearson ("NCS") to screen current airport personnel and test prospective employees for future employment at the nations airports. In order to implement the contract with the TSA, NCS employed persons or "Staffing Specialists" who traveled throughout the United States working 80 to 100 hours a week without receiving overtime compensation. Nationwide class action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the California Labor Code was filed seeking overtime compensation for hundreds of employees who were improperly classified as exempt employees. A Class Action settlement was reached with NCS in excess of $800,000.00.

Proudly serving Los Angeles area, throughout California and nationwide. Including residents of Long Beach, Torrance, Anaheim, Santa Ana, Huntington Beach, San Bernardino, Palm Springs, Riverside, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Fresno, Bakersfield, Stockton, Chula Vista, Irvine, Glendale, Modesto, Oxnard, Oceanside, Santa Clarita, Ontario, Pomona, Malibu, Beverly Hills, Hollywood, South Bay, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Oakland, San Jose, Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Ventura County, San Diego County, Alameda County, San Francisco County, Kern County, Santa Barbara County, Sacramento County, Santa Clara County, and Contra Costa County.  Search Engine Optimization by Omnipresent SEO