Arias Ozzello & Gignac LLP

We Handle Cases throughout the United States

800-475-2570

Navigation

Employment Law | Sexual Harassment | Hostile Work Environment

Edson v. Doe Employer

Plaintiff had been continually sexually harassed by her supervisor. Significant confidential settlement.

Class Action | Employment Law | Improper Classification | Robinson May Inc.

Duran v. Robinson May Inc.

Seeking compensatory damages and injunctive relief for hundreds of "Area Sales Managers" improperly classified as exempt employees which exemption required them to work exorbitant hours with no overtime compensation.

Class Action | Employment Law | Denied Meal and Rest Breaks

Costa v. Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California

Home healthcare workers sought damages, penalties, and injunctive relief on behalf of hundreds of fellow workers who were forced to work off the clock without compensation and were denied rest and meal breaks. Vitas Healtchare Corporation is alleged to have imposed onerous patient loads upon their employees and demanded that employees complete certain administrative tasks at home, all while discouraging requests for overtime pay.

Current Status: The Trial Court has granted final approval to a settlement fund of $15 million, allocated to the Overtime and Meal Break subclasses in equal amounts. The Court described the Settlement as very favorable to the class.

Employment Law | Misclassification | Unpaid Wages

Carlin v. NCS Pearson, Inc.

Following September 11, 2001, the United States Department of Transportation established the Transportation Security Administration ("TSA"). The purpose of the TSA was to effectuate, control, oversee and implement security at the airports located throughout the United States. Pursuant to this objective the TSA contracted with NCS Pearson ("NCS") to screen current airport personnel and test prospective employees for future employment at the nations airports. In order to implement the contract with the TSA, NCS employed persons or "Staffing Specialists" who traveled throughout the United States working 80 to 100 hours a week without receiving overtime compensation. Nationwide class action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the California Labor Code was filed seeking overtime compensation for hundreds of employees who were improperly classified as exempt employees. A Class Action settlement was reached with NCS in excess of $800,000.00.

Employment Law | Wrongful Termination

Hadden v. Doe Employer

Los Angeles County Superior Court. Plaintiff had been improperly terminated for objecting to certain corporate practices and policies. Significant confidential settlement.

Employment Law | Racial Discrimination

Grimes v. Doe Employer

Action by individual to recover damages for racial discrimination in the work place. Plaintiff was subjected to various racial comments and racially motivated conduct by defendant’s management employees. Confidential settlement in excess of $260,000.00.

Class Action | Employment Law | Failure to Pay Overtime

Clark v. FPMI Solutions, Inc.

Nationwide class action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the California Labor Code seeking overtime compensation for employees which were required to work excess hours with no overtime compensation.

Employment Law | Wrongful Termination | Los Angeles

Carter v. Doe Employer

Employee manager was fired for complaining about improper and illegal practices of defendant company. Confidential settlement in excess of $250,000.

Class Action | Disability Rights | Failure to Accommodate Visually Impaired | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power

Boggs v. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Settlement for injunctive relief on behalf of visually impaired customers of one of Southern California’s largest utilities in class action alleging that utility bills, shut-off notices, and information on the utility’s website were not being provided in formats accessible to the visually impaired.

Class Action | Consumer Protection | False Advertising | Ralphs

Ralphs Great Escape Cases

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). This class action sought damages, penalties, and injunctive relief on behalf of hundreds of thousands of Ralphs Club Members who qualified for an award under the “Ralphs Great Escape” promotion but were denied the award. A settlement was reached with Ralphs by which thousands of affected Ralphs customers received coupons for groceries valued at approximately the value of the weekend trip promised by the botched promotion.

Proudly serving Los Angeles area, throughout California and nationwide. Including residents of Long Beach, Torrance, Anaheim, Santa Ana, Huntington Beach, San Bernardino, Palm Springs, Riverside, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Fresno, Bakersfield, Stockton, Chula Vista, Irvine, Glendale, Modesto, Oxnard, Oceanside, Santa Clarita, Ontario, Pomona, Malibu, Beverly Hills, Hollywood, South Bay, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Oakland, San Jose, Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Ventura County, San Diego County, Alameda County, San Francisco County, Kern County, Santa Barbara County, Sacramento County, Santa Clara County, and Contra Costa County.  Search Engine Optimization by Omnipresent SEO