Arias Ozzello & Gignac LLP

We Handle Cases throughout the United States

800-475-2570

Navigation

Class Action | Business Litigation

Scott v. Snell

Sacramento Superior Court (Class Action) filed on behalf of shareholders seeking to recover damages for defendants’ failure to pay fair consideration to the minority shareholders in connection with a going private transaction. The case was settled in 2005 for $1.25 million – representing nearly a 100% increase in the amount paid to the shareholders at the time of the merger.

Class Action | Consumer Fraud | Billing Overcharges From Failure to Prorate Final Month of Billing

Rolnik v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.

Superior Court of New Jersey: Essex Division (Class Action) filed in an effort to recover damages for defendant’s failure to prorate the monthly service fees charged to its customers during their final month of service prior to termination. The case was settled in 2005 for cash and Cash Equivalent Calling Cards totaling more than $49 million.

Class Action | Telecommunications | Failure to Disclose Roaming Charges

Behar International Counsel v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Case No. GIC 820372 (San Diego Superior Court). AOG and Mr. Gignac served as Class Counsel in this class action seeking to recover damages for telecommunications defendant’s failure to disclose the circumstances under which its customers would be charged international roaming charges while traveling overseas. The case was settled in December of 2006. Under the terms of the settlement, class members received bill credits, in-kind benefits and prospective injunctive relief valued at in excess of $3.9 million.

Class Action | Telecommunications | Recover Damages for Inadequate Disclosure of Billing

Lozano v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.

U.S.D.C., Central District of California. AOG served as Class Counsel in this action representing a certified class of cellular telephone customers seeking to recover damages for inadequate disclosures related to “out-of-cycle” billing. The case was settled in 2009-2010. Under the terms of the settlement, the potential recovery for the class was more than $42 million in cash benefits.

Class Action | Telecommunications | For Inadequately Disclosed Service Fees

Stern v. AT&T Mobility Corporation

U.S.D.C., Central District of California. AOG served as Class Counsel in this action representing a certified class of cellular telephone customers seeking to recover damages for the imposition of inadequately disclosed service fees. The case was settled in 2009-2010. Under the terms of the settlement, the potential recovery for the class was more than $38 million in cash benefits.

Business Litigation | Fraudulent Conveyance and Conspiracy to Defraud

Gateway State Bank v. Scapinito

Defendants fraudulently conveyed real property which was secured by a first deed of trust held by plaintiff bank. Obtained a judgment in excess of $2,500,000.

Defense Litigation | Business Litigation

California Province of the Society of Jesus. v. Doe Movie Director/Developer

The firm defended a documentary film developer/director in a suit over rights and title to creative research materials prepared to obtain grant funding for a documentary film on the life of a Father Junipero Serra. A favorable settlement was obtained that included terms allowing our client to continue with the development and production of his documentary film.

Class Action | Constitutional | Statutory Rights

Brown v. Various Retailers

Class action for penalties and injunctive relief for violations arising out of the practice of various retailers for including in their employment applications unlawful questions regarding certain types of misdemeanor convictions. Settlement requires various retailers to change the language in their employment applications to comply with California law. Various retailers paid in excess of $1,000,000.00

Business Litigation | Fraud | Breach of Contract

Manavi v. Sabet

Investors brought claims against developer for fraud and breach of contract with respect to a real estate development. Obtained a verdict in excess of $900,000.

Business Litigation | Fraud | Breach of Contract

Banayan v. Shenassa

Investors brought claims against developer for fraud and breach of contract with respect to a single family development. Obtained a verdict in excess of $650,000.

Proudly serving Los Angeles area, throughout California and nationwide. Including residents of Long Beach, Torrance, Anaheim, Santa Ana, Huntington Beach, San Bernardino, Palm Springs, Riverside, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Fresno, Bakersfield, Stockton, Chula Vista, Irvine, Glendale, Modesto, Oxnard, Oceanside, Santa Clarita, Ontario, Pomona, Malibu, Beverly Hills, Hollywood, South Bay, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Oakland, San Jose, Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Ventura County, San Diego County, Alameda County, San Francisco County, Kern County, Santa Barbara County, Sacramento County, Santa Clara County, and Contra Costa County.  Search Engine Optimization by Omnipresent SEO