Arias Ozzello & Gignac LLP

We Handle Cases throughout the United States

800-475-2570

Navigation

Class Action | Employment Law | Wage & Hour | H&R Block

Ugas v. H&R Block

US District Court—Central District of California—Western Division (Class Action). Class action on behalf of tax professionals alleging that Defendants failed compensate them for overtime, failed to provide meal breaks, and failed to pay the applicable meal break premium (Cal. Labor Code §226), especially during tax season when the employees were often working in excess of 8 hours a day or 40 hours a week.

                                                                                             

Class Action | Employment Law | Wage & Hour | Jackson Limo

Harris v. Jackson Limo

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of limousine drivers for Jackson Limousine. Drivers allege that Defendant failed to compensate them for all hours worked, including time spent waiting for new clients (gap time) and time spent driving to and from Jackson to pick up new clients.

Class Action | Employment Law | Fleetwood

Caloia v. Fleetwood

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of limousine drivers, alleging that Fleetwood failed to pay them overtime compensation and threatened termination or other disciplinary measures if drivers refused to work during rest or meal breaks. 

Class Action | Employment Law | Wage and Hour | Ports America

Williams v. Ports America

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action law suit on behalf of superintendents of Ports America alleging that Defendant misclassified them as exempt and failed to compensate them for overtime when hours worked exceed eight per day or 40 per week.

Class Action | Employment Law | Wage and Hour | MGA Healthcare

William Brothers v. MGA Healthcare

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action lawsuit on behalf of contract nurses employed by MGA Healthcare alleging that Defendant refused to pay overtime compensation for shifts worked longer than eight hours and time worked through meal or rest breaks.

Class Action | Employment Law | Wage and Hour | Best Buy

Pourtemour v. Best Buy

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of Best Buy hourly paid supervisors alleging that their workload was too extensive to complete in eight hours a day or 40 hours a week. Defendants avoided overtime compensation by encouraging the employees to work off the clock or through meal or rest breaks. 

Class Action | Employment Law | Wage and Hour | Sara Lee

Kaewsawang v. Sara Lee

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of delivery drivers for Sara Lee, alleging that Defendants misclassified the drivers as independent contractors and participated in unlawful business practices including but not limited to denying workers overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of 8 per day or 40 per week and failing to provide workers with meal and rest breaks.

Class Action | Disability Rights | Failure to Provide Accessible Sidewalks to Physically Disabled

Fahmie v. City of Los Angeles

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of physically disabled Los Angeles residents, seeking the installation of “curb cuts” at sidewalk corners to make the city’s sidewalks accessible to all of its residents.  The class plaintiff is physically disabled and brought the case after being forced drive her wheelchair down a busy thoroughfare on a daily basis because she could not access the sidewalk and after repeatedly asking the city to install a curb cut only to be rebuffed and told to “get in line.”

Class Action | Disability Rights | Failure to Accommodate Visually Impaired | Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority

Boggs v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of visually impaired bus passengers of the Los Angeles MTA, alleging that the MTA has for years neglected the needs of its visually impaired passengers by failing to call out stops (even when asked), refusing to stop and pick them up at bus stops, and failing to provide accessible schedules and an accessible website.  A proposed settlement of this class action received preliminary approval by the court in December of 2009.

Class Action | Employment Law | Wage & Hour Claim | Failure to Provide Meal & Rest Breaks | Safeway

Esparza v. Safeway

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of current and former hourly supermarket employees of Safeway and Vons in California, alleging that they were not properly compensated for meal and rest breaks that were not timely provided, shorter than required by California law, or missed altogether.

Proudly serving Los Angeles area, throughout California and nationwide. Including residents of Long Beach, Torrance, Anaheim, Santa Ana, Huntington Beach, San Bernardino, Palm Springs, Riverside, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Fresno, Bakersfield, Stockton, Chula Vista, Irvine, Glendale, Modesto, Oxnard, Oceanside, Santa Clarita, Ontario, Pomona, Malibu, Beverly Hills, Hollywood, South Bay, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Oakland, San Jose, Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Ventura County, San Diego County, Alameda County, San Francisco County, Kern County, Santa Barbara County, Sacramento County, Santa Clara County, and Contra Costa County.  Search Engine Optimization by Omnipresent SEO