Arias Ozzello & Gignac LLP

We Handle Cases throughout the United States

800-475-2570

Member Login Area

Navigation

Current Cases

Class Action | Consumer Protection | Telecommunications | Facebook

Price v. Facebook Inc

Facebook has engaged in the practice of charging its “pay per click” advertising customers for “clicks” that either: (a) never actually occurred; or (b) were generated by “robot” computer programs and/or other software programs used by Facebook and/or a third parties engaged by Facebook.  As a result, such advertising customers of Facebook are being charged and are paying monies to Facebook for “false clicks”.

Class Action | Consumer Protection | Telecommunications | DirecTv Inc.

Keiser v. DirecTv Inc.

Defendant has engaged in the deceptive practice of unilaterally extending its customers’ programming commitment term when its customers make a change in the equipment needed to obtain satellite TV service from DirecTV, Inc. (“DirecTV”). Such equipment changes can be in the form of simply adding new equipment or replacing faulty, broken or outdated equipment.

Class Action | Consumer Protection/Telecommunications | Cellco Partnership

Moore v. Cellco Partnership

Verizon has been improperly assessing date charges on its wireless subscriber’s  bills without their knowledge and/or consent.

Class Action | Consumer Protection | Telecommunications | Cellco Partnership

Demmick v. Cellco Partnership

Cellco has engaged in the deceptive practice of (1) misapplying its wireless telephone customers’ usage of included minutes and additional minutes and, as a result, (2) assessing excess additional per minute charges to its customers.

Class Action | Disability Rights | Failure to Provide Accessible Sidewalks to Physically Disabled

Fahmie v. City of Los Angeles

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of physically disabled Los Angeles residents, seeking the installation of “curb cuts” at sidewalk corners to make the city’s sidewalks accessible to all of its residents.  The class plaintiff is physically disabled and brought the case after being forced drive her wheelchair down a busy thoroughfare on a daily basis because she could not access the sidewalk and after repeatedly asking the city to install a curb cut only to be rebuffed and told to “get in line.”

Class Action | Disability Rights | Failure to Accommodate Visually Impaired | Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority

Boggs v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of visually impaired bus passengers of the Los Angeles MTA, alleging that the MTA has for years neglected the needs of its visually impaired passengers by failing to call out stops (even when asked), refusing to stop and pick them up at bus stops, and failing to provide accessible schedules and an accessible website.  A proposed settlement of this class action received preliminary approval by the court in December of 2009.

Class Action | Consumer Protection | Failure to Provide Accurate Closing Statements on Home Mortgages | Pacific Mercantile

Laliberte v. Pacific Mercantile

Orange County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action seeking statutory damages and rescission on behalf of borrowers who obtained mortgages from Pacific Mercantile Bank but were not given a properly itemized closing statement.

Class Action | Employment Law | Statutory Damages Claim | Unlawful Invasion of Privacy Regarding Marijuana Convictions on Employment Application | Starbucks

Lords v. Starbucks

Orange County Superior Court (Class Action). The world’s biggest and most famous purveyor of expensive coffee has been intruding into the privacy of its job applicants by asking them about marijuana convictions that are off limits by order of the California Legislature.  This class action seeks statutory damages and injunctive relief in an effort to stop this abusive practice.

Class Action | Employment Law | Wage & Hour Claim | Failure to Provide Meal & Rest Breaks | Safeway

Esparza v. Safeway

Los Angeles County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of current and former hourly supermarket employees of Safeway and Vons in California, alleging that they were not properly compensated for meal and rest breaks that were not timely provided, shorter than required by California law, or missed altogether.

Class Action | Employment Law | Wage & Hour Claim | Failure to Pay Overtime | Failure to Provide Meal & Rest Breaks | K-Mart

Juarez v. K-Mart

Contra Costa County Superior Court (Class Action). Class action on behalf of employees of various entities that provide janitorial services to retail giant K-Mart, alleging that they were not paid proper wages, including minimum wage and overtime compensation, or provided statutorily mandated meal and rest breaks.

1 2 3 Next

Sort By Case Type

More Information On:

Proudly serving Los Angeles area, throughout California and nationwide. Including residents of Long Beach, Torrance, Anaheim, Santa Ana, Huntington Beach, San Bernardino, Palm Springs, Riverside, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Fresno, Bakersfield, Stockton, Chula Vista, Irvine, Glendale, Modesto, Oxnard, Oceanside, Santa Clarita, Ontario, Pomona, Malibu, Beverly Hills, Hollywood, South Bay, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Oakland, San Jose, Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Ventura County, San Diego County, Alameda County, San Francisco County, Kern County, Santa Barbara County, Sacramento County, Santa Clara County, and Contra Costa County.  Search Engine Optimization by Omnipresent SEO